Collins on 'The Significance of the Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal: Analysis of its Activity Over Four Years'

 Professor Pauline Collins of the USQ School of Law and Justice has published a new article titled 'The Significance of the Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal: Analysis of its Activity Over Four Years'.  The article appears in Volume 32(4) of the Public Law Review.  Here is the abstract:

"The Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal (DFDAT) is a statutory administrative body, not a court, established under the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 (Cth). The Tribunal hears and determines appeals from courts martial and Defence Force magistrate hearings in respect of service offences by Australian Defence Force personnel under the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth). The Tribunal provides the highest-level 'appeal' review in these matters. The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia can be accessed for appeals and reference on questions of law. An appeal from the Federal Court’s decision to the High Court can only occur where the High Court grants special leave. Both types of appeal occur infrequently. Otherwise, the Tribunal’s determination is final. Little legal academic interest in this specialised area provides minimal scrutiny of the decisions of the Tribunal, including decisions in which the Tribunal interprets the High Court’s case law. This article provides an overview of the type of matters heard in the last four years, the Tribunal’s reasoning and the issues highlighted for military discipline. It reveals any current challenges for justice and the rights of military personnel."